FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank #253 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P750.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $100 for the Intel UHD Graphics P750, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 238.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and Intel UHD Graphics P750
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695+2% | 1,669 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+15% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 0 MB. The FirePro W600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 111.3+392% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The FirePro W600 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the FirePro W600 offers 238.3% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5+238% | 16.7 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #732 | #717 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W600 and Intel UHD Graphics P750
