
FirePro W600

Intel UHD Graphics P750
FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W600
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌299.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 293.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695+2% | 1,669 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+15% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 carries 0 MB. FirePro W600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics P750.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 111.3+392% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics P750 was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 11.1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers 296.4% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics P750 (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 11.1+296% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #732 | #717 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















