FirePro W600 vs Radeon E8860

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W600 vs Radeon E8860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W600 vs Radeon E8860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W600

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
99.7% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.

Radeon E8860

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,695 vs 1,686), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon E8860 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.6% (5.6 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E8860 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W600 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W600 vs Radeon E8860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon E8860 reaches 1,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon E8860 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 640 (Radeon E8860). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860).

Feature	FirePro W600	Radeon E8860
G3D Mark Score	1,695	1,686
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W600	Radeon E8860
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8860 carries 512 MB. FirePro W600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 64-bit on the Radeon E8860.

Feature	FirePro W600	Radeon E8860
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon E8860's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (Radeon E8860). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W600	Radeon E8860
TDP	75W	37W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	Unknown	—
Perf/Watt	22.6	45.6+102%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Radeon E8860 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon E8860 was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 5.6 (Radeon E8860) — the Radeon E8860 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E8860 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W600	Radeon E8860
MSRP	$599	$300-50%
Performance per Dollar	2.8	5.6+100%
Codename	Cape Verde	Venus
Release	June 13 2012	January 25 2014
Ranking	#732	#734

Search FirePro W600 on Amazon

Search Radeon E8860 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.