FirePro W600
VS
Radeon R9 M375X

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M375X

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank 253 and the Radeon R9 M375X is on rank 422, so the FirePro W600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
94%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
92%
#238
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5220%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
100%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
96%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
96%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
96%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#259
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
94%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
94%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
93%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
93%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
91%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
88%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
88%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375X

#412
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1587%
#414
1439%
#415
1435%
#419
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1305%
#420
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1296%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
98%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
97%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#431
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
96%
#432
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
96%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
95%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
94%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M375X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.

InsightFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+65.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 M375X

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
G3D Mark Score
1,695
1,711
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.299 TFLOPS+69%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M375X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
22.6
22.8
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250 and now averages $50. The FirePro W600 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 34.2 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the FirePro W600 offers 65.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M375X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP
$599
$250-58%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-40%
$50
Performance per Dollar
56.5+65%
34.2
Codename
Cape Verde
Tropo
Release
June 13 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#732
#727