FirePro W600
Radeon R9 M375X
FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M375X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M375X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M375X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W600
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌139.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M375X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 141.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M375X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695 | 1,711 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+69% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375X.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M375X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M375X was 58.3% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 6.8 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the Radeon R9 M375X offers 142.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375X (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $250-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 6.8+143% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tropo |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #732 | #727 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 M375X
