
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 5830

FirePro W600
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank #253 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5830 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5830 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5830 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and Radeon HD 5830

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695 | 1,726+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1120+119% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+133% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+14% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB. The FirePro W600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 80% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6+128% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 57.5 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 1.8% better value. The FirePro W600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $239-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 57.5+2% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cypress |
| Release | June 13 2012 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #732 | #724 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












