
FirePro W600

Radeon HD 5830
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 5830 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 5830 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 5830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W600
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 280mm, a 112mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$239 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5830
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $360 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
- ❌66.7% longer card at 280mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 5830 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695 | 1,726+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1120+119% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+133% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+14% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 carries 1 GB. FirePro W600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 256-bit on the Radeon HD 5830. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 80% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6+128% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5830 was 60.1% cheaper ($360 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 157.1% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W600 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $239-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 7.2+157% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cypress |
| Release | June 13 2012 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #732 | #724 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















