FirePro W600 vs Quadro 5010M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W600 vs Quadro 5010M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W600 vs Quadro 5010M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W600

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 5010M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,695 vs 1,691), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W600 vs Quadro 5010M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Quadro 5010M reaches 1,691 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 5010M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 384 (Quadro 5010M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M).

Feature	FirePro W600	Quadro 5010M
G3D Mark Score	1,695	1,691
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+11%	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W600	Quadro 5010M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5010M carries 4 GB. Quadro 5010M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 64-bit on the Quadro 5010M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W600) vs 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W600	Quadro 5010M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Quadro 5010M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (Quadro 5010M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W600	Quadro 5010M
TDP	75W-25%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	Unknown	—
Perf/Watt	22.6+34%	16.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro W600 (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro W600	Quadro 5010M
MSRP	$599	—
Codename	Cape Verde	GF110
Release	June 13 2012	February 22 2011
Ranking	#732	#733

Search FirePro W600 on Amazon

Search Quadro 5010M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.