FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W600

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,726 vs 1,695), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 760M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M).

Feature	FirePro W600	GeForce GTX 760M
G3D Mark Score	1,695	1,726+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	1.009 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB+100%	64 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro W600	GeForce GTX 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M.

Feature	FirePro W600	GeForce GTX 760M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro W600	GeForce GTX 760M
TDP	75W	55W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	Unknown	—
Perf/Watt	22.6	31.4+39%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760M (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W600	GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP	$599	—
Codename	Cape Verde	GK106
Release	June 13 2012	May 30 2013
Ranking	#732	#725

Search FirePro W600 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 760M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.