FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 760M
FirePro W600
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank 253 and the GeForce GTX 760M is on rank 97, so the GeForce GTX 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 30.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and GeForce GTX 760M
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695 | 1,726+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.009 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+100% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 31.4+39% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) — the FirePro W600 offers 31.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 760M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5+31% | 43.1 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GK106 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #732 | #725 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W600 and GeForce GTX 760M
