
FirePro W600 vs Radeon HD 7750

FirePro W600
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank #253 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and Radeon HD 7750

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695 | 1,703 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 60°C.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 31.0+37% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 0.5% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $109-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 56.8 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cape Verde |
| Release | June 13 2012 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #732 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















