FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M380

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 915 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W600

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 99.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 96.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,695 vs 1,669), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 96.6% (5.6 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W600 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R7 M380

The Radeon R7 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon R7 M380 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M380 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 640 (Radeon R7 M380). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M380).

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
G3D Mark Score
1,695+2%
1,669
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.171 TFLOPS+52%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M380 carries 512 MB. FirePro W600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M380.

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M380). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M380). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M380).

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M380's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
22.6+1%
22.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Radeon R7 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M380 was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 5.6 (Radeon R7 M380) — the Radeon R7 M380 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M380 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W600Radeon R7 M380
MSRP
$599
$300-50%
Performance per Dollar
2.8
5.6+100%
Codename
Cape Verde
Tropo
Release
June 13 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#732
#737

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.