FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 750

2021Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W600

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 750

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,702 vs 1,695), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 750 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 750

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 reaches 1,702 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750).

FeatureFirePro W600Intel UHD Graphics 750
G3D Mark Score
1,695
1,702
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 12.1
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
512+100%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+15%
0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+100%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W600Intel UHD Graphics 750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 carries 0 MB. FirePro W600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 750.

FeatureFirePro W600Intel UHD Graphics 750
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFirePro W600Intel UHD Graphics 750
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
22.6
113.5+402%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 750 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) — the Intel UHD Graphics 750 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 750 (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W600Intel UHD Graphics 750
MSRP
$599
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.8
Infinity
Codename
Cape Verde
Rocket Lake GT1
Release
June 13 2012
March 30 2021
Ranking
#732
#722

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.