FirePro W600
VS
GeForce GTX 670M

FirePro W600 vs GeForce GTX 670M

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

2012Core: 598 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank 253 and the GeForce GTX 670M is on rank 149, so the GeForce GTX 670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
94%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
92%
#238
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5220%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
100%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
96%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
96%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
96%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#259
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
94%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
94%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
93%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
93%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
91%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
88%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
88%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#139
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
317%
#141
287%
#142
286%
#146
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
260%
#147
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
259%
#149
GeForce GTX 670M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
97%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 670M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.

InsightFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 670M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and GeForce GTX 670M

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
G3D Mark Score
1,695
1,714+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512+52%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
0.8037 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
32
56+75%
L1 Cache
128 KB
448 KB+250%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W600) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 670M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro W600GeForce GTX 670M
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
75°C
Perf/Watt
22.6
22.9+1%