GeForce GTX 560M vs FirePro 3D V8750

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 560M

2011Core: 775 MHz

FirePro 3D V8750

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 560M

1,281

+0.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

FirePro 3D V8750

274

1,272

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 560M is positioned at rank 165 and the FirePro 3D V8750 is on rank 370, so the GeForce GTX 560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

100%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

98%

#155

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

339%

#157

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

307%

#158

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

306%

#162

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

279%

#163

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

277%

#165

GeForce GTX 560M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#173

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#177

GeForce GTX 860M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#179

Radeon R9 360

MSRP: $99|Avg: $55

96%

#180

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $65

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750

#355

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

20807%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

100%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

96%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

93%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

92%

#374

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

86%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

86%

#376

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

86%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

85%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

82%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

79%

#380

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

79%

#381

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

75%

#382

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

75%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

66%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

62%

#385

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

61%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8750.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560M Benchmark Check

FirePro 3D V8750 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560M and FirePro 3D V8750

GeForce GTX 560M

The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.

FirePro 3D V8750

The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M scores 1,281 and the FirePro 3D V8750 reaches 1,272 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
G3D Mark Score	1,281	1,272
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	2048+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5952 TFLOPS	3.482 TFLOPS+485%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB	768 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 560M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	768 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
DirectX	12 (11_0)+19%	10.1
Vulkan	1.2	None
OpenGL	4.0+25%	3.2
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M draws 75W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 114% difference. The GeForce GTX 560M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M	FirePro 3D V8750
TDP	75W-73%	274W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	254mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C-6%	90°C
Perf/Watt	17.1+272%	4.6