GeForce GTX 560M
VS
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

GeForce GTX 560M vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M

2011Core: 775 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 560M is positioned at rank 165 and the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is on rank 164, so the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M

#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
98%
#155
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
339%
#157
307%
#158
306%
#162
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
279%
#163
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
277%
#165
GeForce GTX 560M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#177
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
97%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
96%
#180
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
966%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
928%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
917%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
916%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
914%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
909%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
897%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
894%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
885%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
883%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
872%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
871%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
855%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
854%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
99%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#149
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1065%
#164
100%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
100%
#166
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
100%
#167
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
98%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
97%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
96%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
96%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
94%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 560M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+500%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560M

The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M scores 1,281 and the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,300 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score
1,281
1,300+1%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 560M offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.0
4.5+13%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
17.1
43.3+153%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560MRadeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP
$173
Avg Price (30d)
$35
Codename
GF116
Kaveri Spectre
Release
May 30 2011
January 14 2014
Ranking
#804
#830