
GeForce GTX 280

GeForce GTX 560M
GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 560M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 560M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 280
2008Why buy it
- ✅51.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌214.7% higher power demand at 236W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 560M
2011Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 236W, a 161W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 280 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 560M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 280
The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 560M
The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 280 scores 1,285 and the GeForce GTX 560M reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 560M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,285 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+25% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+5% | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 280 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560M carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 560M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 280 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 280) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560M) — the GeForce GTX 560M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 3 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.0+21% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 280) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 280 draws 236W versus the GeForce GTX 560M's 75W — a 103.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 560M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 280) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 75W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 17.1+217% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 560M (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Codename | GT200 | GF116 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | May 30 2011 |
| Ranking | #802 | #804 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















