GeForce GTX 280
VS
Radeon HD 8790M

GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 8790M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280

2008Core: 602 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8790M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 280 is positioned at rank 314 and the Radeon HD 8790M is on rank 207, so the Radeon HD 8790M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3664%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3520%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3479%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3473%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3466%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3446%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3403%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3390%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3359%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3349%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3309%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3302%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3242%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3240%
#299
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4040%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
100%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
95%
#318
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
86%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
85%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
78%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
77%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
76%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
70%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
66%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8790M

#197
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
416%
#199
377%
#200
376%
#204
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
342%
#205
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
339%
#207
Radeon HD 8790M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
93%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
90%
#222
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8790M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 280.

InsightGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8790M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8790M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280

The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon HD 8790M

The Radeon HD 8790M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280 scores 1,285 and the Radeon HD 8790M reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8790M uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8790M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8790M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
G3D Mark Score
1,285
1,306+2%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS+11%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 280 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8790M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8790M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280) vs 11.1 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8790M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.1 (11_1)
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 280) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8790M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 8790M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
Encoder
None
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280 draws 236W versus the Radeon HD 8790M's 50W — a 130.1% difference. The Radeon HD 8790M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 280) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8790M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
TDP
236W
50W-79%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
75-12%
Perf/Watt
5.4
26.1+383%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8790M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280Radeon HD 8790M
MSRP
$649
Avg Price (30d)
$649
Codename
GT200
Mars
Release
June 16 2008
April 1 2013
Ranking
#802
#797