GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 4000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 280

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌136% higher power demand at 236W vs 100W.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅28.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 236W, a 136W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,287 vs 1,285), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 280 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 280 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 4000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 280

The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280 scores 1,285 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score	1,285	1,287
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	336+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6384 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 280 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 280 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M carries 2 GB. Quadro 4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 280 and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 280) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280 draws 236W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 81% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 280) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro 4000M
TDP	236W	100W-58%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	5.4	12.9+139%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 4000M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro 4000M
MSRP	$649	—
Codename	GT200	GF104
Release	June 16 2008	February 22 2011
Ranking	#802	#801

Search GeForce GTX 280 on Amazon

Search Quadro 4000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.