
GeForce GTX 280

Radeon R7 A370
GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 A370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 A370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 A370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 280
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌335.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌136% higher power demand at 236W vs 100W.
Radeon R7 A370
2015Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 334.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 236W, a 136W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 A370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 280
The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 280 scores 1,285 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,285 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1024+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+221% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 280 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 280 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 280 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 280 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A370. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 280) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A370) — the Radeon R7 A370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 280 draws 236W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 81% difference. The Radeon R7 A370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 280) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 100W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 12.8+137% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 280 came in at $649, while the Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A370 was 77% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GeForce GTX 280) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 A370) — the Radeon R7 A370 offers 330% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A370 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $149-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 8.6+330% |
| Codename | GT200 | Trinidad |
| Release | June 16 2008 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #802 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















