
GeForce GTX 560M

Iris Graphics 540
GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Graphics 540 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Graphics 540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Graphics 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 560M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Iris Graphics 540
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Graphics 540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560M
The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.

Iris Graphics 540
The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560M scores 1,281 and the Iris Graphics 540 reaches 1,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Graphics 540 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 540). Raw compute: 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,281 | 1,270 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5952 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+29% |
| ROPs | 24+300% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 560M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Graphics 540 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560M has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 540 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 560M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M and System on the Iris Graphics 540.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M) vs Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Quick Sync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560M draws 75W versus the Iris Graphics 540's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 540). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.1 | 84.7+395% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Graphics 540 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560M | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GF116 | Skylake GT3e |
| Release | May 30 2011 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #804 | #808 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















