GeForce GTX 660 vs GRID V100D-8Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS

GRID V100D-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts

GeForce GTX 660 vs GRID V100D-8Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 vs GRID V100D-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $9,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4144.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 140W instead of 225W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4266.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $10,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 60.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID V100D-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (4,156 vs 4,040), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 660 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9,771 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4144.9% (17.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID V100D-8Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 660 vs GRID V100D-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.

NVIDIA

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 scores 4,040 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 is built on Kepler while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 660) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660GRID V100D-8Q
G3D Mark Score
4,040
4,156+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960+50%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.981 TFLOPS+18%
1.672 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1306 MHz+26%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
320 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID V100D-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660GRID V100D-8Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 and 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660GRID V100D-8Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 draws 140W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 46.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660GRID V100D-8Q
TDP
140W-38%
225W
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
28.9+56%
18.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 came in at $229, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 660 was 97.7% cheaper ($9771 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (GeForce GTX 660) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 4300% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100D-8Q (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP
$229-98%
$10000
Performance per Dollar
17.6+4300%
0.4
Codename
GK106
GM107
Release
September 6 2012
May 18 2016
Ranking
#490
#622

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.