Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W7000 vs GeForce GTX 660

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
··
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W7000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W7000
4 GB 150
4,304
+6.5%
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon R9 295X2
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 660
3 GB 140
4,040
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX150
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 470
brand logoGeForce GTX 680M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN X
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 vs GeForce GTX 660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    292.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $899 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 660

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 268.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.5% in PassMark G3D (4,304 vs 4,040), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $670 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 268.5% (17.6 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 660 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W7000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W7000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7000

The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 versus the GeForce GTX 660's 4,040 — the FirePro W7000 leads by 6.5%. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 660). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660).

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
G3D Mark Score
4,304+7%
4,040
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+33%
960
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS+23%
1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB+300%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 carries 3 GB. FirePro W7000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660) — the FirePro W7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 660). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 660).

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
UVD
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 660's 140W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
TDP
150W
140W-7%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
242mm
241mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
—
Perf/Watt
28.7
28.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the GeForce GTX 660 launched at $229. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 660 was 74.5% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 17.6 (GeForce GTX 660) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 266.7% better value.

FeatureFirePro W7000GeForce GTX 660
MSRP
$899
$229-75%
Performance per Dollar
4.8
17.6+267%
Codename
Pitcairn
GK106
Release
June 13 2012
September 6 2012
Ranking
#477
#490
Search FirePro W7000 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 660 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.