
FirePro W7000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌292.6% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 660
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro W7000
2012GeForce GTX 660
2012Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌292.6% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W7000 better than GeForce GTX 660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 and GeForce GTX 660

FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 versus the GeForce GTX 660's 4,040 — the FirePro W7000 leads by 6.5%. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 660). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304+7% | 4,040 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+33% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+23% | 1.981 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 660 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W7000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 has 3 GB. The FirePro W7000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660) — the FirePro W7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 660). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 660).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 660's 140W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 140W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7 | 28.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 660 launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 660 costs 74.5% less ($670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 17.6 (GeForce GTX 660) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 266.7% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $229-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 17.6+267% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK106 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #477 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












