GeForce GTX 660
VS
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 660 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%)
Leading raw performance (+5.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $149), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 842% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+842%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660

The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 660 scores 4,040 versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 4,260 — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 leads by 5.4%. The GeForce GTX 660 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 660) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,040
4,260+5%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
1280+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.981 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz+6%
975 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
80 KB
384 KB+380%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 660 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+24%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 660) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 660) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 draws 140W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 24% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 220mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP
140W
110W-21%
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
220mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
28.9
38.7+34%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 660 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The GeForce GTX 660 costs 89.9% less ($134 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 269.3 (GeForce GTX 660) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 841.6% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP
$229
$149-35%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-90%
$149
Performance per Dollar
269.3+842%
28.6
Codename
GK106
Trinidad
Release
September 6 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#490
#456