GeForce GTX 670M
VS
FirePro W600

GeForce GTX 670M vs FirePro W600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

2012Core: 598 MHz
VS

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 670M is positioned at rank 149 and the FirePro W600 is on rank 253, so the GeForce GTX 670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#139
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
317%
#141
287%
#142
286%
#146
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
260%
#147
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
259%
#149
GeForce GTX 670M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
97%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
94%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
92%
#238
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5220%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
100%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
96%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
96%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
96%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#259
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
94%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
94%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
93%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
93%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
91%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
88%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
88%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 670M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.

InsightGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 670M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670M and FirePro W600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670M scores 1,714 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
G3D Mark Score
1,714+1%
1,695
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
336
512+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8037 TFLOPS+5%
0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
448 KB+250%
128 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 256 KB (FirePro W600) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 12 (FirePro W600). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs H.264 (FirePro W600).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
Encoder
No NVENC (Fermi)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670M draws 75W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 0% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs Unknown.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MFirePro W600
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Unknown-100%
Perf/Watt
22.9+1%
22.6