GeForce GTX 670M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 670M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 670M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 670M
The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670M scores 1,714 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,714 | 1,729 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 336 | 384+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8037 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+300% | 6 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 670M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 670M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670M draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9 | 115.3+403% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GF114 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | March 22 2012 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #728 | #723 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655
