GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce GTX 670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank 4 and the GeForce GTX 670M is on rank 149, so the GeForce GT 755M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M

#4

GeForce GT 755M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

94%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

86%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

85%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

78%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

77%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#139

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

317%

#141

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

287%

#142

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

286%

#146

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

260%

#147

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

259%

#149

GeForce GTX 670M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

98%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 755M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 670M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 755M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 670M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 670M

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,714
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+14%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS	0.8037 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	448 KB+1300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 755M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 670M
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.