GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

GeForce GT 755M

2013Core: 980 MHz

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 755M

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Iris Plus Graphics 655

1,729

+0.2%

Iris Graphics 6100

HD Graphics 630

HD Graphics P530

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Arc A380

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank #4 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M

GeForce GT 755M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

94%

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

86%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

85%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

78%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

77%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Iris Plus Graphics 655

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,729
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS	0.8064 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85.