Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M
2 GB 50
1,726
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 940M
brand logoGeForce GTS 450
brand logoGeForce 940MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Shared System RAM 15
1,789
+3.7%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2013 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,789+4%
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
Quick Sync 7
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
Quick Sync 7
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
—
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
34.5
119.3+246%