
GeForce GT 755M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank #4 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

GeForce GT 755M
The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,769+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 704+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+134% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5 | 50.5+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Raven |
| Release | June 25 2013 | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #726 | #673 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















