GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

  • 13.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M465X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,787 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M465X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M465X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,787+4%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
0.9472 TFLOPS+26%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M465X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 755M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
DirectX
12 (11_0)+8%
11.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCE (Early)
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
34.5+45%
23.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465X (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MRadeon R7 M465X
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK107
Tropo
Release
June 25 2013
May 15 2016
Ranking
#726
#715

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.