GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce GTX 650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank #4 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M

#4

GeForce GT 755M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

94%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

86%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

85%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

78%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

77%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 650

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce GTX 650

The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the GeForce GTX 650 reaches 1,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 650 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 650). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,756+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS	0.8125 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	80 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 650).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 650's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GT 755M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	GeForce GTX 650
TDP	50W-23%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	34.5+28%	27.0