GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M

2 GB 50

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

1,789

+3.7%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Plus Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2013 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,789+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs QuickSync.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Iris Plus Graphics
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.