G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 670M

2012

Why buy it

✅93.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 93.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition instead at 1,726 vs 1,714, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,714
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+14%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8333 TFLOPS+4%	0.8037 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	448 KB+1300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 670M gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	3 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	34.5+51%	22.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce GTX 670M
MSRP	$200	—
Codename	GK107	GF114
Release	November 8 2013	March 22 2012
Ranking	#925	#728

Search GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.