GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M375X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M375X

2015

Why buy it

  • 22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M375X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition instead at 1,726 vs 1,711, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 26.1% (8.6 vs 6.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M375X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon R9 M375X
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,711
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
1.299 TFLOPS+56%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M375X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon R9 M375X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375X.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon R9 M375X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon R9 M375X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
34.5+51%
22.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition was 20% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 6.8 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 26.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon R9 M375X
MSRP
$200-20%
$250
Performance per Dollar
8.6+26%
6.8
Codename
GK107
Tropo
Release
November 8 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#925
#727

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.