
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M375X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M375X
2015Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M375X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,711 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8333 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+56% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M375X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375X.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5+51% | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition was 20% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 6.8 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 26.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375X (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-20% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+26% | 6.8 |
| Codename | GK107 | Tropo |
| Release | November 8 2013 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #925 | #727 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















