Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.5 GB 50
1,726
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 940M
brand logoGeForce GTS 450
brand logoGeForce 940MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V
Iris Plus Graphics
Shared System RAM 15
1,789
+3.7%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    100% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 107.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2013 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 107.3% (17.9 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,789+4%
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
—
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
34.5
119.3+246%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 108.1% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$200
$100-50%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
17.9+108%
Codename
GK107
Ice Lake GT2
Release
November 8 2013
sem dados
Ranking
#925
#714
Search GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.