GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

50

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

1,789

+3.7%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Iris Graphics 6100

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #388 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

#378

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1258%

#380

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1140%

#381

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1137%

#385

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1034%

#386

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1027%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

100%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

99%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

98%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

97%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

96%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#399

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

93%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

93%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#403

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 29.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+29.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and Iris Plus Graphics

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,789+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8333 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Iris Plus Graphics
TDP	50W	15W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	34.5	119.3+246%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 29.6% better value.