GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #388 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

#378

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1258%

#380

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1140%

#381

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1137%

#385

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1034%

#386

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1027%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

100%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

99%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

98%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

97%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

96%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#399

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

93%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

93%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,769+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	704+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8333 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+111%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32	44+38%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
TDP	50W	35W-30%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	75-12%
Perf/Watt	34.5	50.5+46%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).