GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018

Why buy it

  • 62.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (1,769 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,769+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
704+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+111%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
44+38%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and System on the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
TDP
50W
35W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
34.5
50.5+46%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
Infinity
Codename
GK107
Raven
Release
November 8 2013
May 10 2018
Ranking
#925
#673

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.