GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R7 M465X

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R7 M465X Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

0.5 GB 50

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

1,787

+3.5%

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R7 M465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

✅9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M465X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,787 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M465X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 38% (11.9 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M465X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,787+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8333 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	128 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M465X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
DirectX	12 (11_0)+8%	11.1
Vulkan	1.2+20%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	VCE (Early)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	UVD
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	34.5+45%	23.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M465X was 25% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 11.9 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the Radeon R7 M465X offers 38.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465X (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP	$200	$150-25%
Performance per Dollar	8.6	11.9+38%
Codename	GK107	Tropo
Release	November 8 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#925	#715

Search GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.