GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7750

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7750

2012Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 83.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7750

2012

Why buy it

  • 7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $91 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 81% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition instead at 1,726 vs 1,703, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 81% (15.6 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7750

The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
G3D Mark Score
1,726+1%
1,703
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS+2%
0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 carries 4 GB. Radeon HD 7750 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7750.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
72 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
TDP
50W-9%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
60°C-29%
Perf/Watt
34.5+11%
31.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7750 was 45.5% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 81.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionRadeon HD 7750
MSRP
$200
$109-46%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
15.6+81%
Codename
GK107
Cape Verde
Release
November 8 2013
February 15 2012
Ranking
#925
#731

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.