GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Iris Plus Graphics 655
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,729 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8333 TFLOPS+3% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5 | 115.3+234% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 655 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | November 8 2013 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #925 | #723 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and Iris Plus Graphics 655
