GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
VS
Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #388 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

#378
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1258%
#380
1140%
#381
1137%
#385
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1034%
#386
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1027%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
97%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,789+4%
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
Quick Sync 7
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Quick Sync 7
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
34.5
119.3+246%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionIris Plus Graphics 950
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
34.5
Infinity
Codename
GK107
Ice Lake GT2
Release
November 8 2013
sem dados
Ranking
#925
#634