Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Firepro W5170M vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

CPUCPUGPUGPU

Firepro W5170M

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Buy on Amazon

Firepro W5170M vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Performance Spectrum

Firepro W5170M
2 GB 30
1,774
+2.8%
brand logoRadeon HD 8690M
brand logoGeForce GT 650M
brand logoRadeon HD 7850M
brand logoRadeon 630
brand logoArc A380
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.5 GB 50
1,726
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 940M
brand logoGeForce GTS 450
brand logoGeForce 940MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W5170M vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W5170M

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Firepro W5170M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (1,774 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Firepro W5170M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Firepro W5170M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W5170M vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W5170M

The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
1,774+3%
1,726
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS+42%
0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+400%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Firepro W5170M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W5170M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition carries 512 MB. Firepro W5170M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W5170M and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder
UVD
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 50% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
—
Height
0mm
—
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
59.1+71%
34.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Firepro W5170M (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirepro W5170MGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP
—
$200
Codename
Tropo
GK107
Release
August 25 2014
November 8 2013
Ranking
#662
#925
Search Firepro W5170M on AmazonSearch GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.