Firepro W5170M vs Radeon R7 M465X

Firepro W5170M

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Firepro W5170M vs Radeon R7 M465X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W5170M vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W5170M

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M465X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,787 vs 1,774), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Firepro W5170M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M465X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M465X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Firepro W5170M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W5170M vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W5170M

The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score
1,774
1,787
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS+25%
0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
925 MHz
925 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W5170M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. Firepro W5170M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W5170M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
DirectX
12+8%
11.1
Vulkan
1.2+20%
1.0
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: UVD vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X).

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE (Early)
Decoder
UVD
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
59.1+148%
23.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465X (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirepro W5170MRadeon R7 M465X
MSRP
$150
Codename
Tropo
Tropo
Release
August 25 2014
May 15 2016
Ranking
#662
#715

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.