Firepro W5170M
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro W5170M
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Firepro W5170M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro W5170M
The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,774 | 1,789 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+16% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1000 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W5170M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. Firepro W5170M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W5170M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: UVD vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | UVD | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.1 | 119.3+102% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W5170M and Iris Plus Graphics 950
