FirePro M6000
VS
Firepro W5170M

FirePro M6000 vs Firepro W5170M

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
VS

Firepro W5170M

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M6000 is positioned at rank 193 and the Firepro W5170M is on rank 6, so the Firepro W5170M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000

#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
99%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
97%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
92%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
90%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
89%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
88%
#178
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2434%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
96%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
96%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
91%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
87%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
87%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Firepro W5170M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
167%
#6
Firepro W5170M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Firepro W5170M.

InsightFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro M6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6000 and Firepro W5170M

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

Firepro W5170M

The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Firepro W5170M reaches 1,774 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Firepro W5170M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 640 (Firepro W5170M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
G3D Mark Score
1,820+3%
1,774
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+16%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (Firepro W5170M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
DirectX
11.1
12+8%
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Firepro W5170M's 30W — a 35.6% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (Firepro W5170M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
TDP
43W
30W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
42.3
59.1+40%
💰

Value Analysis

The Firepro W5170M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
MSRP
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
Heathrow
Tropo
Release
July 1 2012
August 25 2014
Ranking
#710
#662