FirePro M6000 vs Firepro W5170M

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

Firepro W5170M

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M6000 vs Firepro W5170M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs Firepro W5170M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 43.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 30W.

Firepro W5170M

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 43W, a 13W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,820 vs 1,774), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M6000 vs Firepro W5170M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

Firepro W5170M

The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Firepro W5170M reaches 1,774 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Firepro W5170M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 640 (Firepro W5170M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
G3D Mark Score
1,820+3%
1,774
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+16%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 64-bit on the Firepro W5170M.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (Firepro W5170M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
DirectX
11.1
12+8%
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Firepro W5170M's 30W — a 35.6% difference. The Firepro W5170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (Firepro W5170M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
TDP
43W
30W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
42.3
59.1+40%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Firepro W5170M (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000Firepro W5170M
MSRP
$300
Codename
Heathrow
Tropo
Release
July 1 2012
August 25 2014
Ranking
#710
#662

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.