FirePro M6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M6000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌186.7% higher power demand at 43W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 194.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 43W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,820 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2012 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 194.9% (17.9 vs 6.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M6000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score	1,820+2%	1,789
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	640+25%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+25%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
DirectX	11.1	12_1+8%
Max Displays	6	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs QuickSync.

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
Encoder	VCE 1.0	QuickSync
Decoder	UVD 4.0	QuickSync
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 96.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
TDP	43W	15W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	42.3	119.3+182%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 193.4% better value.

Feature	FirePro M6000	Iris Plus Graphics
MSRP	$300	$100-67%
Performance per Dollar	6.1	17.9+193%
Codename	Heathrow	Ice Lake GT2
Release	July 1 2012	sem dados
Ranking	#710	#714

Search FirePro M6000 on Amazon

Search Iris Plus Graphics on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.