CPU
GPU
FirePro M6000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M6000 is positioned at rank #193 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Vega (2017−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6000 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H
FirePro M6000
The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.
Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,856 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H reaches 1,856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,820 | 1,856+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H has 0 MB. The FirePro M6000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (12_1)+8% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H's 15W — a 96.6% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 15W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.3 | 123.7+192% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M6000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (FirePro M6000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Heathrow | Vega |
| Release | July 1 2012 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #710 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M6000 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 7 3750H
