Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V7800 vs FirePro M6000

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V7800

2014Core: 850 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V7800 vs FirePro M6000 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V7800
2 GB 274
1,867
+2.6%
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
FirePro M6000
2 GB 43
1,820
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6700M
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs FirePro M6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7800

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    153% HIGHER MSRP
    $759 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ❌537.2% higher power demand at 274W vs 43W.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $459 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 146.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 43W instead of 274W, a 231W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V7800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,867 vs 1,820), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $459 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $759, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.6% (6.1 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro M6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V7800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs FirePro M6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V7800

The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the FirePro M6000 reaches 1,820 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M6000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 640 (FirePro M6000). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
G3D Mark Score
1,867+3%
1,820
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+220%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+240%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+220%
40
L1 Cache
512 KB+220%
160 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7800 and 64-bit on the FirePro M6000. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 256 KB (FirePro M6000) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 11.1 (FirePro M6000). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
DirectX
11.0
11.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
Encoder
UVD 2.3
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the FirePro M6000's 43W — a 145.7% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 350W (FirePro M6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
TDP
274W
43W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
6.8
42.3+522%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V7800 came in at $759, while the FirePro M6000 launched at $300. On MSRP, FirePro M6000 was 60.5% cheaper ($459 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 6.1 (FirePro M6000) — the FirePro M6000 offers 144% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V7800 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800FirePro M6000
MSRP
$759
$300-60%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
6.1+144%
Codename
Tahiti
Heathrow
Release
January 18 2014
July 1 2012
Ranking
#423
#710
Search FirePro 3D V7800 on AmazonSearch FirePro M6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.