Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE Performance Spectrum

FirePro M6000
2 GB 43
1,820
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6700M
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
GeForce GTX 560 SE
1 GB 150
1,847
+1.5%
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GT 745A
brand logoGeForce GT 740
brand logoGeForce GTX 555
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 43W instead of 150W, a 107W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    100% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 103% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌248.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 43W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,847 vs 1,820), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 103% (12.3 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M6000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
G3D Mark Score
1,820
1,847+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+122%
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+21%
0.8479 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
160 KB
384 KB+140%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE carries 1 GB. FirePro M6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
DirectX
11.1
12_0+8%
Max Displays
6+200%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 110.9% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
TDP
43W-71%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
210mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
—
Perf/Watt
42.3+244%
12.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 SE was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 101.6% better value.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 560 SE
MSRP
$300
$150-50%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
12.3+102%
Codename
Heathrow
GF114
Release
July 1 2012
February 20 2012
Ranking
#710
#706
Search FirePro M6000 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 560 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.