FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 675M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M6000 is positioned at rank 193 and the GeForce GTX 675M is on rank 129, so the GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

99%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

97%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

92%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

90%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

89%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

88%

#178

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2434%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

100%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

96%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

96%

#200

Radeon Pro Duo

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799

91%

#201

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

91%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

87%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

87%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6000.

Insight	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro M6000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 675M

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	1,820	1,855+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+8%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	160 KB	512 KB+220%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6000) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	11.1	12 (11_0)+8%
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	UVD 4.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 82°C.