FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 675M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 43W instead of 100W, a 57W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌132.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 43W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (1,855 vs 1,820), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 675M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	1,820	1,855+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+8%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	160 KB	512 KB+220%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6000) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	11.1	12 (11_0)+8%
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	FirePro M6000	GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	UVD 4.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 82°C.