FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 43W instead of 75W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M360

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌74.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 43W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,820 vs 1,819), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $300 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.1% (6.1 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360).

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
G3D Mark Score
1,820
1,819
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+8%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 carries 512 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
DirectX
11.1
12_0+8%
Max Displays
6
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
β€”
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W β€” a 54.2% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
TDP
43W-43%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
β€”
Perf/Watt
42.3+74%
24.3
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) β€” the Radeon R9 M360 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M360 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon R9 M360
MSRP
$300
$300
Performance per Dollar
6.1
6.1
Codename
Heathrow
Tropo
Release
July 1 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#710
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.