
FirePro M6000

Radeon R9 M360
FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6000
2012Why buy it
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 43W instead of 75W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β74.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6000
The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,820 | 1,819 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+8% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 carries 512 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12_0+8% |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W β a 54.2% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-43% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 42.3+74% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) β the Radeon R9 M360 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M360 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Codename | Heathrow | Tropo |
| Release | July 1 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #710 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















