
FirePro M6000

GRID M60-0B
FirePro M6000 vs GRID M60-0B Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6000 vs GRID M60-0B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M6000 vs GRID M60-0B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6000
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $19,600 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
- β Delivers 6468.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 43W instead of 225W, a 182W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M60-0B
2015Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β6533.3% HIGHER MSRP$19,900 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($19,900 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β423.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 vs GRID M60-0B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6000
The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

GRID M60-0B
The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,820 | 1,838 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+371% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 768 KB+380% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-0B carries 512 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-0B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6000) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) β the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W β a 135.8% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-81% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 42.3+416% | 8.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the GRID M60-0B launched at $19900. On MSRP, FirePro M6000 was 98.5% cheaper ($19600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) β the FirePro M6000 offers 6000% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-0B (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M6000 | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-98% | $19900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+6000% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Heathrow | GM204 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #710 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















