FirePro M6000 vs GeForce MX130

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

2017Core: 1122 MHzBoost: 1242 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce MX130 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce MX130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$120 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • 43.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 30W.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $180 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 147.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 43W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,820 vs 1,805), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX130 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 cheaper on MSRP at $120 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.9% (15.0 vs 6.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX130 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M6000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce MX130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the GeForce MX130 reaches 1,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce MX130
G3D Mark Score
1,820
1,805
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+7%
0.9539 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
160 KB
192 KB+20%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce MX130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX130 carries 512 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX130. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6000) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce MX130
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 35.6% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce MX130
TDP
43W
30W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
42.3
60.2+42%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the GeForce MX130 launched at $120. On MSRP, GeForce MX130 was 60% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 15.0 (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 offers 145.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX130 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce MX130
MSRP
$300
$120-60%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
15.0+146%
Codename
Heathrow
GM108
Release
July 1 2012
November 17 2017
Ranking
#710
#713

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.