Firepro W5170M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro W5170M
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Firepro W5170M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro W5170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro W5170M
The Firepro W5170M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,774 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W5170M scores 1,774 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W5170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 640 (Firepro W5170M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Firepro W5170M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,774+3% | 1,729 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+47% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1050 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W5170M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 carries 0 MB. Firepro W5170M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W5170M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Firepro W5170M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro W5170M) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: UVD vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W5170M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W5170M draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W5170M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.1 | 115.3+95% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Firepro W5170M | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | Tropo | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | August 25 2014 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #662 | #723 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W5170M and Iris Plus Graphics 655
